Of Microbes and Men - The Fermi Paradox

Exobiology
Written By my Re

Introduction

Habitable planets are believed to be common throughout the universe, so where are all the aliens?
SpaceEngine PRO © Cosmographic Software LLC

Alone in a Crowd?

Common bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus, not assembling a smartphone or arguing about pineapple on pizza.
NASA (Public domain)

Here’s a no-brainer: intelligent life exists in the universe. Exhibit A? Us! Yep, you and I, sipping coffee and pondering the stars, are inassailable proof that brains capable of building smartphones and arguing over pizza toppings can exist. But it does make you wonder: are there other intelligent beings out there, maybe debating their own version of pineapple-on-pizza somewhere in the vastness of space?

Sure, many animals on Earth get the whole “I think, therefore I am” thing1, and a few of them, like crafty crows or wise elephants, get the “I think, and also other people think“ as well2, but none of them are launching rockets or writing sci-fi novels. If we’re hunting for alien civilizations with tech as fancy as ours (or fancier!), we’ve got to look beyond our pale blue dot to distant stars. Spoiler alert: so far, our search for cosmic kin has been a bit of a letdown. We used to envision Martian metropolises or Venusian villages, but we haven’t found so much as an alien amoeba, let alone a little green man.

Still, the question nags at us like a catchy song stuck in our heads: Are we alone? Even without definitive evidence, we can play detective, piecing together clues from life on Earth to sketch out what alien life might look like. Meanwhile, we keep scouring Mars’ dusty dunes and Enceladus’ icy oceans, hoping to stumble across a microbial “hello.”

Adventures in Astrobiological Spitballing

Running the Numbers

Innumerable stars and planets fill the universe. But how many are home to beings like us? Let’s do the numbers.
SpaceEngine PRO © Cosmographic Software LLC

Fermi & Drake: Not-So-Scary Numbers

Enter the Fermi Paradox, one of the universe’s most frustrating head-scratchers. It goes like this: the galaxy’s chock-full3 of potentially habitable planets, and it’s been around for billions of years. Even with slow, sub-lightspeed spaceships, a motivated alien civilization could’ve turned the Milky Way into their personal playground by now4. So, where’s the galactic welcome mat? Why isn’t our cosmic neighborhood buzzing with alien tourists? Something’s gotta be holding back the interstellar party planners, but what?

To crack this mystery, we turn to the Drake Equation5, a cosmic recipe for guessing how many alien civilizations might be out there waving “hi” (or at least broadcasting something we could detect). It looks like this:

N = R✴ • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L

Woah! Translation, please!

  • N: How many alien civilizations we might detect.
  • R✴: How many new stars pop up in the galaxy each year.
  • fp: The fraction of stars with planets.
  • ne: How many of those planets are Earth-like.
  • fl: The odds that an Earth-like planet grows life.
  • fi: The odds that life gets smart.
  • fc: The odds that smart life starts sending out cosmic postcards (like radio signals).
  • L: How long those civilizations stay “online” for us to notice.

The Inconvenient Truth

Here’s the catch: we only have solid numbers for R✴ (about one star forms per year6) and fp (surveys say nearly every star has planets7). The rest? Total guesswork. We don’t know how many planets are cozy for life, how often life pops up, or if it evolves into something that invents Wi-Fi. And how long do civilizations last before they, say, binge-watch themselves into extinction? No clue.

So, what did Frank Drake do back in 1961? He and his pals took a wild stab at it:

  • 1 star forms per year (nailed it).
  • 20–50% of stars have planets (modern data says closer to 100%—nice!).
  • Each star has 1–5 Earth-like planets.
  • All Earth-like planets sprout life (bold!).
  • All life gets intelligent (super bold!).
  • 10–20% of intelligent life sends detectable signals.
  • Civilizations stay detectable for 1,000 to 100 million years (that’s a big range!).

Plug in those numbers, and you get anywhere from 20 to 50 million alien civilizations in the Milky Way5. That’s like saying, “There could be 20 people at the party… or 50 million.” Not exactly helpful! The equation’s more of a cosmic thought experiment, pointing out three big question marks:

  • Does every star system have at least one life-friendly planet?
  • Does every life-friendly planet always cook up intelligent life?
  • Do advanced civilizations stick around for thousands or millions of years, beaming signals like cosmic DJs?

Are these guesses legit, or are we just shouting into the void? Let’s put on our detective hats and find out!

Habitable Worlds and Where to Find Them

Physical Solutions to the Fermi Paradox

Galaxy M61 contains hundreds of millions of stars. But which, if any, are circled by Earth’s distant cousins?
ESA/Hubble & NASA, ESO, J. Lee and the PHANGS-HST Team (CC BY 4.0)

Water, Water Everywhere

Let’s begin with the first question: Does every star system have at least one life-friendly planet?

To figure this out, we need to talk about what makes a planet “life-friendly.” Here on Earth, every critter from tiny bacteria to massive whales needs liquid water to keep the party going, so it’s a safe bet alien life might need it too (though we’ll circle back to that idea later). For water to stay liquid, not frozen into cosmic ice cubes or boiled away into space steam, a planet needs to orbit in the circumstellar habitable zone, aka the “Goldilocks zone,” where it gets just the right amount of starlight. Too much (more than 110%8 of what Earth gets), and you’ve got a runaway greenhouse sauna that evaporates the oceans; too little (less than 35%9), and you’re stuck with a frozen snowball planet.

Out of the confirmed exoplanets we’ve spotted, about sit in this Goldilocks sweet spot, suggesting roughly 3% of planets might be habitable. But hold your space horses—that’s a super rough guess, and there’s plenty of debate about whether the real number’s way higher or lower.

The Pessimistic Case: The Universe Is a Tough Neighborhood

Imagine a cosmic barbecue gone wrong. This tidally-locked world is like a badly done steak - burnt on one side, barely lukewarm on the other.
SpaceEngine PRO © Cosmographic Software LLC

Picture a planet where one side’s roasting under a never-setting sun while the other’s locked in eternal, teeth-chattering darkness. Could life even deal with that?

Some folks, waving the Rare Earth Hypothesis10 flag, argue that habitable planets are rarer than a polite internet comment section. They say a planet needs a ton of things to go just right to host life, even if it’s in the Goldilocks zone. Obvious stuff includes:

  • A chill star that doesn’t barbecue its planets.
  • A star not too beefy (under 1.5 times the Sun’s mass) so it sticks around long enough for life to evolve past the slime stage.
  • Enough heft to hold onto its oceans and atmosphere, unlike poor, nearly-airless Mars.
  • Not a gas giant—life needs a solid surface to hang out on.
  • No constant asteroid bombardment turning the planet into a cosmic pinata.

Then there’s the more unexpected stuff:

  • A star that avoids the galaxy’s spiral arms, where supernovae spew out deadly radiation.
  • No , so the planet doesn’t have one side frozen solid while the other’s a lava lamp.
  • A nice, circular orbit for stable weather (unlike with orbits loopier than a rollercoaster).
  • A Jupiter-like gas giant sibling to fend off rogue asteroids, but not so close it yeets the planet out of orbit.
  • A magnetic field to shield the atmosphere from solar flares.
  • to keep the climate in check with a fancy .
  • A big moon to stabilize the planet’s wobble, avoiding climate chaos.
  • Just the right amount of water—not so much it’s a global swimming pool, but enough for life to splash around in.

Phew! That’s longer than my grocery list. If all these boxes need checking, the odds of finding a habitable planet might drop from “slim” to “forget about it!” Just ruling out (maybe-) gas giants shrinks our set of 176 candidates to a measly 8.

The Neutral Case: Maybe the Universe Isn’t That Picky

But hold up—don’t write off the cosmic party just yet. The Rare Earth crowd might be painting the universe as a barren wasteland, but new data and snazzy computer models are loosening up those strict rules:

Not a planet? Not a problem! The moons of big, warm gas giants may well be suitable habitats for complex life.
SpaceEngine PRO © Cosmographic Software LLC

  • Earth’s zipped through the Milky Way’s spiral arms plenty of times without getting zapped into extinction11, 12.
  • Tidally locked planets? They might still have cozy climates if their atmospheres shuffle heat to the dark side13, 14, 15.
  • Wacky, elliptical orbits? Some planets can still stay habitable16.
  • Jupiter as a cosmic bodyguard? Turns out, it might cause as many asteroid problems as it solves17.
  • No magnetic field? Venus is rocking a thick atmosphere without one, so maybe it’s not a dealbreaker18, 19.
  • Our big Moon stabilizing Earth’s tilt? Nice, but a faster-spinning planet could do without it20.
  • Gas giants in the Goldilocks zone might have Earth-like moons throwing their own life parties21.
  • Even planets drowning in water might still have some land thanks to some geochemical magic22.
  • Plate tectonics, like on Venus and Europa, might be more common than we thought23, 24.

Here’s the thing: Earth’s our only data point, like judging a whole restaurant based on one dish. Our planet’s quirks, like its oversized Moon, restless crust, or magnetic shield, might just be happy accidents, not must-haves for life. Maybe alien life’s out there thriving on planets we’d find super weird. Who are we to say they can’t make it work without our exact setup?

So, how common are Earth-like planets? Are they one-in-a-billion unicorns or more like one-in-ten cosmic regulars? With these optimistic updates, I’m betting closer to the latter. But here’s a wild thought: do we even need Earth-like planets for life to throw a party? Let’s keep pondering that one!

The Optimistic Case: It’s Way Wilder Than We Thought!

But much of the astrobiology crowd is way more chill than the Rare Earth grumps, betting that way more than 3% of planets out there could be hosting life, even if it’s just the microbial equivalent of a cosmic couch potato. Here on Earth, we’ve got extremophiles—tough little critters that laugh in the face of conditions that’d make us humans cry for our mommies. These bad boys might find boiling-hot or freezing-cold planets downright cozy. Heck, even in our own “barren” Solar System, there are spots these weirdos would call home sweet home.

Let’s take a tour of some freaky places and meet the Earthlings that’d thrive there, proving life’s got more grit than a sci-fi action hero.

Case 1: Mars, the Red Planet Rave

Mars is like the universe’s worst Airbnb: bone-dry, freezing, toxic, with an atmosphere so thin it’s practically on a hunger strike. Step outside without a spacesuit, and you’d be gasping, freezing, and boiling (yep, all at once!) faster than you can say “Martian vacation fail.” But Earth’s desert lichens, like Xanthoria parietina, would shrug and say, “Hold my photosynthesis.” These guys can handle Mars’ brutal dryness and radiation25 (same fix for both—tough DNA!) and even survived two weeks in the vacuum of space26. Cold? No problem! Some bacteria stay peppy at -40°C27 and water bear tuns can nap at near absolute zero (-272°C) and wake up like nothing happened28. Picture lichen colonies chilling under Martian rocks, sipping tiny bits of groundwater, maybe hosting a whole microscopic ecosystem. (Our Mars rovers might accidentally be dropping these party crashers off already!)

Case 2: Europa’s Deep-Sea Disco

Next stop, Europa, Jupiter’s icy moon. Its surface is a radioactive, airless ice rink, but beneath that frozen crust lies a massive liquid water ocean twice or thrice the size of ours. This sea, maybe 100–200 km deep29, sits above a rocky floor spitting organic goodies30 from hydrothermal vents29. Sounds promising, right? Except it’s pitch-black and the ocean floor’s crushed under 2,500 atmospheres of pressure, enough to squish a human into cosmic soup. Oh, and it might be super salty31. Earth’s vent-dwellers, though, aren’t fazed. Down in our own dark oceans, critters like giant tubeworms and blind shrimp feast on toxic vent chemicals, no sunlight needed. Europa’s ocean might get some oxygen32 from radiation-soaked ice, cutting the Sun’s last tie. Pressure? Earth’s deep-sea shrimp and sea cucumbers handle 1,200 atmospheres of pressure in the Mariana Trench; give ‘em deeper oceans, and they’d probably evolve to take it. Salt? Some bacteria33 and fungi34 laugh at salinity. Enceladus35, Mimas36, and even Pluto37 might have similar oceans, so life could be throwing raves all over the Solar System!

Case 3: KOI-4878.01’s Acidic Hot Tub

Let’s zoom 1,120 light-years to KOI-4878.01, a candidate rocky planet orbiting a slightly brighter star than our Sun. If it exists, it’d likely be a toasty, high-pressure world, perhaps with seas laced with sulfuric acid like Venus’ nasty clouds. Sounds like a nightmare, but Earth’s Methanopyrus kandleri archaea would be like, “122°C? Psh, I’m just warming up38!” Some microbes might handle up to 150°C38, and others, like Picrophilus torridus, swim happily in flesh-eating acids39. Complex Earth life might struggle, but these archaea could be the seeds of something bigger on such a hellish world.

Case 4: Kepler-22b’s Sky-High Social

At 640 light-years, Kepler-22 b chills in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star, but it’s no Earth twin. This , over twice Earth’s width, probably has a steamy atmosphere of water, CO2, and maybe hydrogen40, with a core of exotic ice under a scalding, high-pressure ocean. But up in its clouds? Perfectly temperate. Earth’s skies are full of aeroplankton: drifting bacteria, algae41 and even tiny spiders42 hitching rides on static-charged silk. These would love the dense air and strong winds of Kepler-22, which would keep them aloft far better than Earth's comparatively measly atmosphere. Some birds like swifts live in the air for months43, munching on these drifters. Imagine Kepler-22b’s clouds buzzing with green-tinted alien plankton and maybe even giant air-whales filtering the mist with organic nets. It’s like a sci-fi Woodstock in the sky!

Case 5: OGLE-2016-BLG-1928’s Pitch-Dark Party

Deep in the galactic core, OGLE-2016-BLG-1928 is a rogue planet drifting starless through the void. No sunlight, just a trickle of geothermal heat from its radioactive core and a brilliant starry sky that’d make you weep in awe. Life here might huddle in oceans under thick ice, sipping energy from vents like on Europa. Or, if volcanic hydrogen builds a hefty atmosphere, a greenhouse effect could keep things warm enough for surface water44. Earth’s photosynthetic green sulfur bacteria thrive in the abyssal gloom around hydrothermal vents45. Something similar could eke out a living here, basking in faint starlight or geothermal glow.

The Super Optimistic Case: Life’s Weirdest Mixtape

All these examples stick to Earth’s playbook—DNA, water, carbon-based life. But what if the universe is jamming to a totally different tune? Some scientists think life could ditch DNA for molecules like RNA, glycol nucleic acid () (loves hot worlds46), or peptide nucleic acids () (acid-proof47). Water’s great, but ammonia48 or sulfuric acid48 could play solvent on super-cold or super-hot planets respectively. Even weirder, hydrophobic stuff like gasoline48 or Titan’s methane lakes48 could host life using delicate molecules water would wreck. Titan’s surface is already turning and hydrogen into methane49—maybe some form of exotic life is doing it! Wildest of all, life might not even need carbon. Silicon50 can form complex molecules, boron51, 52 might work in a pinch (though it’s rare and explosive), and in crazy-hot conditions, aluminium52 could link up with silicon and oxygen for life that laughs at lava. These exotic biochemistries have flaws; silicon loves crystals, boron’s a fire hazard, but they might let life thrive in places even the hardiest Earth microbe would call uninhabitable.

The Cosmic Takeaway: Life’s a Survivor

Earth shows us that life’s tougher than a survival show contestant, finding ways to thrive in the universe’s harshest corners. Whether it’s Martian lichens, Europa’s vent-dwellers, or hypothetical methane-munchers on Titan, Frank Drake might’ve been onto something: life might always find a way, no matter how bizarre the stage. So, maybe the universe is throwing a wilder party than we ever imagined. We just haven’t RSVP’d yet!

Convergence vs. Contingency

Evolutionary Solutions to the Fermi Paradox

Many habitable worlds may decorate the cosmos, but how many will produce creatures like us?
SpaceEngine PRO © Cosmographic Software LLC

Life’s a Party, but Are All Planets Serving Brain Food?

Alright, it seems Frank Drake nailed the first part: simple life is tough as nails, possibly throwing microbial raves across the cosmos. But what about his second big bet: that every planet with life inevitably whips up intelligent life, like us humans with our memes and moon landings? It’s a massive leap from microbe to man. So, let’s dive into the data and see if the universe is churning out civilizations left and right.

Rewind to the Weirdest Beach Party Ever

Picture this: it’s 518 million years ago, and you’re splashing around in the shallow seas of what’s now the of Yunnan, China. The sun’s shining, the waves are lapping, but this ain’t no Bahamas vacay. No coconut trees, no scuttling crabs, no coral reefs. None of those things had yet evolved, so there's just a barren shoreline and an atmosphere so oxygen-poor53 you’d need a spacesuit to avoid . Plants won’t start pumping out breathable air for another 50 million years54, so you’re stuck lugging scuba tanks through alien-esque tidepools.

Dive in, though, and it’s a wild scene: tubular sponges55 swaying like funky straws, sparkly proto-comb jellies56 flashing like underwater fireworks, and tentacled worms55 chilling in the mud. Zipping around are armored palaeoscolecid worms55, scooting trilobites55, clambering lobopodians55, and tadpole-like vetulicolians55. You’ve got Haikouichthys57, a proto-fish, schooling nervously to dodge Anomalocaris55, the primitive ocean’s resident monster-truck predator. It’s a bizarre, bustling reef party, until ice ages58 and toxic seas59 choke out the tropical vibes in some ten million years. Anomalocaris and friends get the boot60, sponges and vetulicolians limp along, but Haikouichthys? That little fishy seizes the day, its descendants spreading like wildfire and eventually leading to… well, us!

The ‘Dinosauroid’, a fictional intelligent dinosaur designed by Dale Russell in 1982. Russell believed all intelligent life would converge to a humanoid form, regardless of ancestry.
Jim Linwood (CC BY 2.0)

Hindsight’s 20/20, but Evolution’s a Dice Roll

If you had to bet on which critter’s great-grandkids would rule Earth, you’d pick Haikouichthys because, well, spoilers: we’re here. But what if that ice age never hit? What if the gravitational tugs from Venus, Mars, and Jupiter didn’t line up to trigger it? What if we rewound the tape recorder of life, so to speak, and changed a few things around? Would vertebrates still have taken over, or would we be living in a world run by tentacled worms or armoured tadpoles? Drake and Carl Sagan would’ve said, “Absolutely, we’ve got this!” They believed would always cook up fish-like critters that’d dominate the planet, eventually leading to upright, big-brained critters like us61. Swap out Haikouichthys for a vetulicolian or even Anomalocaris, and you’d still end up with something human-ish, they argued, because we and our anatomy are just that awesome.

Sorry, Sagan—Intelligence Isn’t the Cosmic MVP

Here’s the plot twist: Earth’s history says Drake and Sagan were probably dreaming. Most life on this planet hasn’t spent 4 billion years trying to get smarter. Microbes, plants, fungi and invertebrates aren’t “primitive” leftovers. They’ve been evolving just as long as we have and own us in terms of , ecological impact, and sheer biomass62. If brains were the ultimate evolutionary power-up, why did only one lineage out of billions hit the intelligence jackpot? Cavefish ditch eyes because they don’t need them; redwood trees and deep-sea worms skip brains for the same reason. Intelligence? It’s nice, but most life seems to say, “Nah, we’re good.”

Dominance Isn’t About Brains—It’s About Luck

An example of real-world dinosaur intelligence: Velociraptor mongoliensis. This small, bird-like theropod possessed respectable smarts, yet was clearly not on the path to civilization.
Fred Wierum (CC BY-SA 4.0)

And here’s where it gets messier: even when a lineage gets smart, it doesn’t guarantee world domination. I fibbed a bit earlier. Those ice ages didn’t just hand vertebrates the crown. For 100 million years after, Earth was ruled by giant nautiluses63 and sea scorpions64 that weren’t exactly Mensa members but still ran the show. It took two more mass extinctions for a vertebrate to become Earth’s biggest beast64. Our own protomammal ancestors had their day in the Permian until a Siberian volcano smoked them. Proto-crocodiles took over the Triassic until Pangaea’s breakup benched them65. Dinosaurs reigned for the next 135 million years until an asteroid slammed into the Yucatán, wiping out all but the birdy ones. Mammals stepped up, and only much later did a clever ape figure out how to sharpen a rock. Every great dynasty rose not by outsmarting the competition but by surviving random apocalypses66.

Most dinosaurs were about as smart as crocodiles or chickens67, with stiff, clapping hands68 or wings—enough for great success in the game of life, but not exactly primed for rocket science. Our own ancestors were tiny little shrew-things, too busy dodging dinos and scrapping with their own Mesozoic cousins69 to evolve big brains. If that asteroid had missed Earth by ten minutes, skipping the sulphur beds that fueled climate chaos70, Earth would probably still be a planet of beasts, not men71.

Contingency, Not Convergence: We’re a Cosmic Fluke

Natural history tells us that this smooth march of progress probably isn’t the true story of evolution.
G Avery - Scientific American (Public Domain)

Even when smart critters rule, jumping from “pretty clever” to “building-civilizations” is no cakewalk. Convergent evolution, where similar traits pop up repeatedly because they’re useful, is very real. Octopuses, crows, elephants, apes, and parrots are all respectably brainy, doing things like crafting tools72 and anticipating the future73. But human-level intelligence? That’s a one-hit wonder. Unlike octopuses or crows, who can munch raw meat or survive without coats, we humans have to craft tools or we’re toast. In 4 billion years, only one lineage—ours, plus close cousins like Neanderthals—have developed that kind of dependency. We're a weird fluke, not a core-meta strategy.

And indeed, our story’s downright bizarre. In the Miocene, some 10074 ape species roamed Africa and Eurasia’s rainforests. Then Earth dried up, rainforests shrank, and three-quarters of those apes went extinct74. Only our own ancestors learned to walk upright74 and abandoned the shrinking forests for the savanna, incidentally freeing up their hands for tool use. We've dodged extinction many times, with genetic diversity so low it hints at disastrous near-wipeouts that reduced us to a few scattered survivors75. Those brutal evolutionary pressures pushed us to tool-using stardom, but weren’t so lucky. If becoming a tool-dependent brainiac requires that kind of cosmic gauntlet, most smart species might get crushed before they can shine.

The Cosmic Takeaway: Intelligence Is a Fluke, Not a Guarantee

So, does every life-friendly planet churn out brainy beings? Earth’s story screams “Nope!” Intelligence doesn't look like the inevitable finish line. It’s probably a cosmic lottery ticket, and we’re the only ones who got to cash it in. Maybe the galaxy's full of alien microbes partying in exoplanetary oceans, but intelligent aliens debating alien pizza toppings? That’s a much tougher bet.

The March of Progress

Technological Solutions to the Fermi Paradox

Was it inevitable that we would leave our caves and become an interplanetary species? Or was it down to strokes of luck?
© Traumrune/Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)

From Microbes to Men: Can They Even Get There?

So, it seems Frank Drake was right about simple life being the universe’s toughest party guest, but jumping from microbes to philosophers is a cosmic long shot. Let’s say some plucky planet does spawn intelligent life. That brings us to Drake’s third big question: do advanced civilizations hang around for thousands or millions of years, blasting signals like cosmic DJs spinning intergalactic hits? Let’s explore the possibilities and see if the universe’s brainiacs are built to last.

Hitting the Big Leagues: Easier Said Than Done

For most of human history, we were just scrappy hunter-gatherers, chasing dinner across the savanna. Only in the last 4% of our species’ existence have we even started on the path to tech fancy enough to catch a discerning alien’s attention. But do all smart species pass this cosmic practical exam, or do some get stuck in the Stone Age?

Although impressively intelligent and equipped with dexterous manipulators, octopuses may be barred from technological civilization due to the fundamental nature of their habitat.
Nick Hobgood (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Take fire, humanity’s first killer app. While some critters use wildfires to scare off rivals, only we humans mastered starting and keeping flames. Fire let us cook, fend off predators, and eventually craft ceramics and metals—game-changers for agriculture, industry, and TikTok. Without it, we’d still be clubbing bunnies in the savanna no matter how big our brains got. But what about aquatic aliens in Europa’s icy oceans? They might grill fish at hydrothermal vents, but smelting metal underwater? No metals, no factories, no spaceships, and so those brainy squid are stuck philosophizing under the ice. They might not even know stars exist! Even on land, if a planet’s atmosphere has less than 16% oxygen76, fire’s a no-go, leaving land-dwellers as stranded as their fishy friends.

The hurdles keep coming. Carnivorous aliens might be too busy chasing lunch to settle down77 and invent labs. Planets without tameable beasts of burden, like horses or cattle, might miss out on the labor-intense trade and conquest that sparked our innovation (sorry, Americas, no horses meant a tech lag78). Young planets or ones with boring geology might lack fossil fuels79, leaving alien industrialists pedaling hamster wheels for power. Or imagine blind, echolocating aliens who never look up to see the stars, or high-gravity dwellers who find space travel as appealing as a root canal. None of these are dealbreakers, but every extra delay is a chance for an asteroid, supervolcano, or nuclear war to wipe the slate clean. The longer it takes, the fewer civilizations make it to the cosmic stage.

Do They Survive the Cosmic Gauntlet?

An eco-friendly utopia like this may be functionally indistinguishable from a barren nuclear wasteland for lonely aliens looking for company.
Aerroscape & Lino Zeddies (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Okay, let’s say some aliens do build their version of the internet. Can they keep the lights on long enough for us to notice? We’ve been broadcasting radio signals and polluting our atmosphere for about 200 years80, and despite doomsday tweets, we’re not that close to self-destruction. Killer asteroids, nuclear oopsies, or climate chaos could end us, but predicting that is like guessing tomorrow’s TikTok trends—too many wildcards. Still, even thriving civilizations might go radio silent for reasons that aren’t apocalyptic.

Why’d They Stop Broadcasting?

Back in the 20th century, we were blasting radio signals and pumping out artificial gases like chlorofluorocarbons: alien-detectable80 proof we’re here. Now? We’re smarter. Signals zip through undersea cables (no need to waste bandwidth on aliens who aren’t paying for Netflix), and we’re cutting back on nasty emissions, swapping CFCs for CO2, which blends in with natural sources. A “responsible” civilization cleans up its act, which is great for the planet but bad for SETI. Our signals fizzle out after a few hundred light-years81, and even our best telescopes can only spot a “green” civilization a few dozen light-years away. If aliens follow our lead, they might go eco-friendly and vanish from our radars after a couple centuries81, leaving millions of civilizations out there sipping cosmic kombucha, completely invisible to us.

Too Extra to Miss?

But not every civilization can hide. Super-advanced aliens building , launching self-replicating space probes or waging interstellar wars would be as subtle as a supernova at a library. We’d spot them with even our clunkiest telescopes—yet we see nada82, 83. So, either these galactic overlords don’t exist, or they’re not local. Why? Maybe the universe is too young and we’re the early birds84, pioneering civilization in a cosmic Wild West. Or maybe advanced aliens don’t care about colonizing everything, happily chilling in their home systems85. Perhaps there’s a galactic VIP club cloaked by some Prime Directive-style stealth tech, and we’re not cool enough to get an invite86. Or, scariest of all, maybe all civilizations self-destruct before they go big87.

The Cosmic Takeaway: Long-Lived Aliens Might Be Hiding

Earth’s story suggests getting to “detectable civilization” status is like winning a cosmic obstacle course. Technology, resources, and dumb luck all have to line up. Even then, signals loud enough for us to hear might only last a cosmic eyeblink. The universe could be teeming with civilizations, but if they’re eco-conscious or just not into galactic conquest, we’d never know. To find out, we might need to hop in our own starships and knock on some alien doors. Until then, we’re left wondering: are they out there, or is the universe just ghosting us?

The Cosmic Curtain Call: Are We Solo or Surrounded?

Just what might we find, as we take our first tentative steps beyond Earth?
NASA/Crew of STS-132 (Public domain)

A Universe Alive with Possibility

Peering through our telescopes, we catch fleeting glimpses of a universe that whispers: life might not be Earth’s private party. Out there, among the swirling galaxies, our strange cousins could be dancing: bizarre parodies of plants and animals playing evolution’s greatest hits on repeat across the cosmos. Perhaps, in some distant corner, beings like us gaze at their own starry skies, wondering, “Is anyone else out there?” Their thoughts, like ours, might echo through the void, a quiet chorus of curiosity.

Our Cosmic Quest

But don’t hold your breath for an alien Zoom call. The universe isn’t delivering extraterrestrial pen pals to our doorstep. If we want to meet our cosmic kin, we’ve got to roll up our sleeves, sharpen our tech, and fling our probes and dreams into the stars. We must become explorers, chasing the faint signals of life across light-years, our hearts alight with hope.

Kindling the Spark

And if the stars stay silent? If our search finds only echoes? Then it’s on us to nurture the fragile flame of our own sapience, to fan it into a blaze that rivals the constellations. We are the universe’s storytellers, its questioners, its dreamers. Whether alone or among a galactic choir, our task is the same: to weave a legacy that burns bright enough to light the cosmic dark.

The Final Note

So, let’s keep looking—through telescopes, through dreams, through the courage to ask. The universe is vast, its secrets veiled, but every star we study is a step toward knowing. Are we alone? Maybe not. But until we find out, let’s make our spark a supernova.

References

1 Plotnik, J. M., de Waal, F. B. M., & Reiss, D. (2006). Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(45), 17053-17057. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608062103

2 🔒Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, 28(5), 606-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12036

3 Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., & Marcy, G. W. (2013). Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(48), 19273-19278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319909110

4 🔒Jones, E. M. (1976). Colonization of the galaxy. Icarus, 28(3), 421-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(76)90156-1

5 🔒Drake, F. D. (1961). Project Ozma. Physics Today, 14(4), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3057500

6 Zari, E., Frankel, N., & Rix, H.-W. (2023). Did the Milky Wya just light up? The recent star formation history of the Galactic disc. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 669, A10. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244194

7 Cassan, A., Kubas, D., Beaulieu, J.-P., Dominik, M., Horne, K., Greenhill, J., Wambsganss, J., Menzies, J., Williams, A., Jørgensen, U. G., Udalski, A., Bennett, D. P., Albrow, M. D., Batista. V., Brilliant, S., Caldwell, J. A. R., Cole, A., Coutures, Ch., Cook, K. H., ..., & Wyrzykowski, Ł. (2012). One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature, 481, 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10684

8 🔒Gómez-Leal, I., Kaltenegger, L., Lucarini, V., & Lunkeit, F. (2019). Icarus, 321, 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.11.019

9 Kopparapu, R. K., (2013). A revised estimate of the occurrence rate of terrestrial planets in the habitable zones around Kepler M-dwarfs. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 767, L8. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L8

10 📖Ward, P. D., Brownlee, D. E. (2000). Rare Earth: Why complex life is uncommon in the universe. Copernicus Publications.

11 🔒Koeberl, C., Farley, K. A., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Sephton, M. A. (2004). Geochemistry of the end-Permian extinction even in Austria and Italy: No evidence for an extraterrestrial component. Geology, 32(12), 1053-1056. https://doi.org/10.1130/G20907.1

12 🔒Barash, M. S. (2014). Mass extinction of the marine biota at the Ordovician-Silurian transition due to environmental changes. Oceanology, 54, 780-787. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437014050014

13 Popp. M., & Eggl, S. (2017). Climate variations on Earth-like circumbinary planets. Nature Communications, 8, 14957. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14957

14 Merlis, T. M., & Schneider, T. (2010). Atmospheric dynamics of Earth-like tidally locked aquaplanets. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2, 13. https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.13

15 Hu, Y., & Yang, J. (2013). Role of ocean heat transport in climates of tidally locked exoplanets around M dwarf stars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315215111

16 Dressing, C. D., Spiegel, D. S., Scharf, C. A., Menou, K., & Raymond, S. N. (2010). Habitable cliamtes: The influence of eccentricity. The Astrophysical Journal, 721(2), 1295. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1295

17 🔒Horner, J., & Jones, B. W. (2010). Jupiter: Friend or foe? An answer. Astronomy & Geophysics, 51(6), 6.16-6.22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4004.2010.51616.x

18 🔒Ramstad, R., & Barabash, S. (2021). Do intrinsic magnetic fields protect planetary atmospheres from stellar winds? Space Science Reviews, 217, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00791-1

19 🔒Joshi, M. M., Haberle, R. M., & Reynolds, R. T. (1997). Simulations of the atmospheres of synchronously rotating terrestrial planets orbiting M dwarfs: Conditions for atmospheric collapse and the implications for habitability. Icarus, 129(2), 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1997.5793

20 🔒Lissauer, J. J., Barnes, J .W., & Chambers, J. E. (2012). Obliquity variations of a moonless Earth. Icarus, 217(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.10.013

21 🔒Heller, R., & Barnes, R. (2013). Exomooon habitability constrained by illumination and tidal heating. Astrobiology, 13(1), 18-46. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2012.0859

22 Cowan, N. B., & Abbot, D. S. (2014). Water cycling between ocean and mantle: Super-Earths need not be waterworlds. The Astrophysical Journal, 781, 27. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/27

23 🔒Weller, M. B., Evans, A. J., Ibarra, D. E., & Johnson, A. V. (2023). Venus's atmospheric nitrogen explained by ancient plate tectonics. Nature Astronomy, 7, 1436–1444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02102-w

24 🔒Murchie, S. L. (1990). The tectonics of icy satellites. Advances in Space Research, 10(1), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(90)90101-5

25 Mattimore, V., & Battista, J. R. (1996). Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. Journal of Bacteriology, 178(3), 633-637. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.3.633-637.1996

26 Lorenz, C., Bianchi, E., Poggiali, G., Alemanno, G., Benesperi, R., Brucato, J. R., Garland, S., Helbert, J., Loppi, S., Lorek, A., Maturilli, A., Papini, A., de Verra, J.-P., & Baqué, M. (2023). Surviviability of the lichen Xanthoria parietina in simulated Martian environmental conditions. Scientifc Reports, 13, 4893. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32008-6

27 🔒Panikov, N. S., Flanagan, P. W., Oechel, W. C., Mastepanov, M. A., & Christensen, T. R. (2006). Microbial activity in soils frozen to below -39°C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38(4), 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.004

28 📖Horikawa, D. D. (2011). Anoxia. Springer Dordtrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1896-8

29 Lowell, R. P., & DuBose, M. (2005). Hydrothermal systems on Europa. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(5), L05202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022375

30 Borucki, J. G., Khare, B., & Cruikshank, D. P. (2002). A new energy source for organic synthesis in Europa's surface ice. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 107(E11), 24-1-24-5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JE001841

31 🔒Kivelson, M. G., Khurana, K. K., Russell, C. T., Volwerk, M., Walker, R. J., & Zimmer, C. (2000). Galileo magnetometer measurements: A stronger case for a subsurface ocean at Europa. Science, 289(5483), 1340-1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5483.1340

32 Szalay, J. R., Allegrini, F., Ebert, R. W., Bagenal, F., Bolton, S. J., Fatemi, S., McComas, D. J., Pontoni, A., Saur, J., Smith, H. T., Strobel, D. F., Vance, S. D., Vorburger, A., & Wilson, R. J. (2024). Oxygen production from dissociation of Europa's water-ice surface. Nature Astronomy, 8, 567-576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02206-x

33 Ollivier, B., Caumette, P., Garcia, J. L., & Mah, R. A. (1994). Anaerobic bacteria from hypersaline environments. Microbiological Reviews, 58(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.58.1.27-38.1994

34 🔒Gostinčar, C., Lenassi, M., Gunde-Cimerman, N., & Plemenitaš, A. (2011). Fungal adaptation to extremely high salt concentrations. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 77, 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387044-5.00003-0

35 🔒Thomas, P. C., Tajeddine, R., Tiscanero, M. S., Burns, J. A., Joseph, J., Loredo, T. J., Helfenstein, P., & Porco, C. (2016). Enceladus’s measured physical libration requires a global subsurface ocean. Icarus, 264, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.037

36 🔒Lainey, V., Rambaux, N., Tobie, G., Cooper, N., Zhang, Q., Noyelles, B., & Baillié, K. (2024). A recently formed ocean inside Saturn’s moon Mimas. Nature, 626, 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06975-9

37 🔒Hussmann, H., Sohl, F., & Spohn, T. (2006). Subsurface oceans and deep interiors of medium-sized outer planet satellites and large trans-Neptunian objects. Icarus, 185(1), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2006.06.005

38 Clarke, A. (2014). The thermal limits to life on Earth. International Journal of Astrobiology, 13(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550413000438

39 Schleper, C., Pühler, G., Klenk, H.-P., & Zillig, W. (1996). Picrophilus oshimae and Picrophilus torridus fam. nov., gen. nov., sp. nov., two species of hyperacidophilic, thermophilic, heterotrophic, aerobic archaea. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 46(3), 814-816. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-3-814

40 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., Fressin, F., Torres, G., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., Gautier, T. N. III, Geary, J. C., Gilliland, R., Gould, A., Howell, S. B., Jenkins, J. M., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., ..., & Rapin, W. (2012). Kepler-22b: A 2.4 Earth-radius planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star. The Astrophysical Journal, 745(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/1200

41 Wiśniewska, K. A., Śliwińska-Wilczewska, S., & Lewandowska, A. U. (2020). The first characterization of airborne cyanobacteria and microalgae in the Adriatic Sea region. PLOS One, 15(9), e0238808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238808

42 🔒 Schneider, J. M., Roos, J., Lubin, Y., & Henschel, J. R. (2001). Dispersal of Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae): They do balloon after all! The Journal of Arachnology, 29(1), 114-116. https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202(2001)029[0114:DOSDAE]2.0.CO;2

43 Hedenström, A., Norevik, G., Warfvinge, K., Andersson, A., Bäckman, J., & Åkesson, S. Annual 10-month aerial life phase in the common swift Apus apus. Current Biology, 26(22), 3066-3070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.014

44 🔒Stevenson, D. J. (1999). Life-sustaining planets in interstellar space? Nature, 400, 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/21811

45 Beatty, J. T., Overmann, J., Lince, M. T. & Plumley, F. G. (2005). An obligately photosynthetic bacterial anaerobe from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(26), 9306-9310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503674102

46 🔒Meggers, E., & Zhang, L. (2010). Synthesis and properties of the simplified nucleic acid glycol nucleic acid. Accounts of Chemical Research, 43(8), 1092-1102. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900292q

47 Zhao, X.-L., Chen, B.-C., Han, J.-C., Wei, L., & Pan, X.-B. (2015). Delivery of cell-penetrating peptide-peptide nucleic acid conjugates by assembly on an oligonucleotide scaffold. Scientific Reports, 5, 17640. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17640

48 📖National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Space Studies Board, Committee on the Origins and Evolution of Life, Committee on the Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems. (2007). The limits of organic life in planetary systems. National Academies Press.

49 Strobel, D. F. (2010). Molecular hydrogen in Titan’s atmosphere: Implications of the measured tropospheric and thermospheric mole fractions. Icarus, 208(2), 878-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010.03.003

50 Pace, N. R. (2001). The universal nature of biochemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(3), 805-808. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.3.805

51 Scorei, M. (2012). Is boron a prebiotic element? A mini-review of the essentiality of boron for the appearance of life on Earth. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 42, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-012-9269-2

52 📖Koerner, D., & LeVay, S. (2001). Here be dragons: The scientific quest for extraterrestrial life. Oxford University Press.

53 Saltzman, M. R., Young, S. A., Kump, L. R., & Runnegar, B. (2011). Pulse of atmospheric oxygen during the late Cambrian. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(10), 3876-3881. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011836108

54 Rubinstein, C. V., Gerrienne, P., de la Puente, G. S., Astini, R. A., & Steemans, P. (2010). Early Middle Ordovician evidence for land plants in Argentina (eastern Gondwana). New Phytologist, 188, 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03433.x

55 Chen, F., Zhang, Z., Betts, M. J., Zhang, Z., & Liu, F. (2019). First report on Guanshan Biota (Cambrian Stage 4) at the stratotype area of Wulongqing Formation in Malong County, Eastern Yunnan, China. Geoscience Frontiers, 10(4), 1459-1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.09.010

56 Zhao, Y., Vinther, J., Parry, L. A., Wei, F., Green, E., Pisani, D., Hou, X., Edgecombe, G. D., & Cong, P. (2019). Cambrian sessile, suspension feeding stem-group ctenophores and evolution of the comb jelly body plan. Current Biology, 29(7), 1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.036

57 🔒Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Han, J., Zhang, Z.-F., Yasui, K., Janvier, P., Chen, L., Zhang, X.-L., Liu, J.-N., Li, Y., & Liu, H.-Q. (2003). Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys. Nature, 421, 526–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01264

58 🔒Zhang, L., Algeo, T. J., Zhao, L., Dahl, T. W., Chen, Z.-Q., Zhang, Z., Poulton, S. W., Hughes, N. C., Gou, X., & Li, C. (2023). Environmental and trilobite diversity changes during the middle-late Cambrian SPICE event. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 136(1-2), 810-828. https://doi.org/10.1130/B36421.1

59 🔒Zhuravlev, A. Y., & Wood, R. A. (1996). Anoxia as the cause of the mid-Early Cambrian (Botomian) extinction event. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 24(4), 311-314. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024%3C0311:AATCOT%3E2.3.CO;2

60 🔒Gerhardt, A. M., & Gill, B. C. (2016). Elucidating the relationship between the later Cambrian end-Marjuman extinctions and SPICE Event. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 461, 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.08.031

61 📰Mayr, E., & Sagan, C. (1996, May–June). The search for extraterrestrial intelligence: Scientific quest or hopeful folly? A debate between Ernst Mayr and Carl Sagan. Bioastronomy News, 16(3), 4-13. The Planetary Society. Retrieved from https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/planetology/lectures/wise2015_2016/mayr_and_sagan_1996.pdf

62 Kröger, B., & Zhang, Y.-B. (2009). Pulsed cephalopod diversification during the Ordovician. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 273(1-2), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.12.015

63 🔒Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018). The biomass distribution on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(25), 6506-6511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711842115

64 📖Hallam, A., & Wignall, P. B. (1997). Mass extinctions and their aftermath. Oxford University Press.

65 🔒Brusatte, S. L., Benton, M. J., Ruta, M., & Lloyd, G. T. (2008). Superiority, competition, and opportunism in the evolutionary radiation of dinosaurs Science, 321(5895), 1485-1488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161833

66 🔒Bakker, R. T. (1968). The superiority of dinosaurs. Discovery, 3(2), 11-12.

67 Caspar, K. R., Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, C., Bertrand, O. C., Carr, T., Colbourne, J. A. D., Erb, A., George, H., Holtz, T. R. Jr., Naish, D., Wylie, D. R., & Hurlburt, G. R. (2024). How smart was T. rex? Testing claims of exceptional cognition in dinosaurs and the application of neuron count estimates in palaeontological research. The Anatomical Record, 307(12), 3685-3716. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25459

68 Hutson, J. D. (2015). Quadrupedal dinosaurs did not evolve fully pronated forearms: New evidence from the ulna. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 60(3), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00063.2014

69 Brocklehurst, N., Panciroli, E., Benevento, G. L., & Benson, R. B. J. (2021). Mammaliaform extinctions as a driver of the morphological radiation of Cenozoic mammals. Current Biology, 31(13), 2955-2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.044

70 Henehan, M. J., Ridgwell, A., Thomas, E., Zhang, S., Alegret, L., Schmidt, D. N., Rae, J. W. B., Witts, J. D., Landman, N. H., Greene, S. E., Huber, B. T., Super, J. R., Planavsky, N. J., & Hull, P. M. (2019). Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(45), 22500-22504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905989116

71 Dean, C. D., Chiarenza, A. A., Doser, J. W., Farnsworth, A., Jones, L. A., Lyster, S. J., Outhwaite, C. L., Valdes, P. J., Butler, R. J., & Mannion, P. D. (2025). The structure of the end-Cretaceous dinosaur fossil record in North America. Current Biology, 35(9), 1973-1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2025.03.025

72 Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D. (2003). Direct observations of pandanus-tool manufacture and use by a New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) Animal Cognition, 7, 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0200-0

73 Schnell, A. K., Boeckle, M., Rivera, M., Clayton, N. S., & Hanlon, R. T. (2021). Cuttlefish exert self-control in a delay of gratification task. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288, 20203161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.3161

74 🔒Urciuoli, A., & Alba, D. M. (2023). Systematics of Miocene apes: State of the art of a neverending controversy. Journal of Human Evolution, 175, 103309https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103309

75 🔒Hu, W., Hao, Z., Du, P., di Vincenzo, F., Manzi, G., Cui, J., Fu, Y.-X., Pan, Y.-H., & Li, H. (2023). Genomic inference of a severe human bottleneck during the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition. Science, 381(6661), 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq7487

76 🌐US Department of the Interior. (2023, October 19). Wildland fire facts: There must be all three. National Park Service. https://www.nps.gov/articles/wildlandfire-facts-fuel-heat-oxygen.htm

77 🌐Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2024, February 16). Half of the world’s habitable land is used for agriculture. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/global-land-for-agriculture

78 📖Smil, V. (2017). Energy and civilization: A history The MIT Press.

79 Nelsen, M. P., DiMichele, W. A., Peters, S. E., & Boyce, C. K. (2016). Delayed fungal evolution did not cause the Paleozoic peak in coal production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(9), 2442-2447. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517943113

80 Sheikh, S. Z., Huston, M. J., Fan, P., Wright, J. T., Beatty, T., Martini, C., Kopparapu, R., & Frank, A. (2025). Earth detecting Earth: At what distance could Earth's constellation of technosignatures be detected with present-day technology? The Astronomical Journal, 169(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ada3c7

81 Forgan, D. H., & Nichol, R. C. (2011). A failure of serendipity: the Square Kilometre Array will struggle to eavesdrop on human-like extraterrestrial intelligence. International Journal of Astrobiology, 10(2), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550410000236

82 Wright, J. T., Griffith, R. L., Sigurđsson, S., Povich, M. S., & Mullan, B. (2014). The Ĝ infrared search for extraterrestrial civilizations with large energy supplies. II. Framework, strategy, and first result. The Astrophysical Journal, 792, 27. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/27

83 Griffith, R. L., Wright, J. T., Maldonado, J., Povich, M. S., Sigurđsson, S., & Mullan, B. (2015). The Ĝ infrared search for extraterrestrial civilizations with large energy supplies. III. The reddest extended sources in WISE. The Astrophysics Journal Supplement Series, 217, 25. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/25

84 🗞️Kaufman, M. (2016, August 25). Are we the earliest intelligent life in the universe? National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/08/25/491307739/are-we-the-earliest-intelligent-life-in-the-universe

85 📖Webb, S. (2015). If the universe is teeming with aliens ... where is everybody? Springer Charm. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13236-5

86 🔒Ball, J. A. (1973). The zoo hypothesis. Icarus, 19(3), 347-349. hhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(73)90111-5

87 🔒von Hoerner, S. (1961). The search for signals from other civilizations. Science, 134(3493), 1839-1843. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3493.1839

----------

🔒Closed-access article

📖Book

🌐Webpage

🗞️News report

📰Newsletter article

my Re
Next

Quick Thoughts - Type Ia Supernovae and the Cosmic Distance Ladder